IGR scored 35/100 for growth, blending a 3-year historical track record (60%) with analyst forward estimates (40%). Historical revenue has been declining (-8.9% CAGR), a headwind. Net income expanded at 212.2%, indicating material earnings growth. Forward: analysts forecast 16.1% revenue growth next year, EPS expected to fall -21.6%. Overall, growth signals are weaker across available historical and forward metrics. Forecasts and analyst targets are estimates and may be inaccurate.

Insufficient price history to assess momentum. Score defaulted to neutral (50).

IGR scores 9/100 for profitability, assessed sector-relative on margins and via absolute thresholds for capital efficiency. Gross margin of 13.8% is 69% below the sector average of 45% — suggesting below-average pricing power or higher input costs vs peers. The company is currently loss-making with a net margin of -13.7%. FCF conversion of 0% is low — reported earnings may overstate true cash generation. Overall, profitability metrics are weaker across multiple model inputs. Profitability trends can change and should be reviewed alongside balance-sheet risk.

IGR received a valuation score of 57/100 using sector-relative scoring. Its Forward P/E of 16.1x is 11% below the sector average of 18x. EV/EBITDA of 15.9x sits 33% above the sector norm of 12x. Overall, valuation multiples are broadly in line with selected sector references. Valuation metrics are not forecasts of future returns.

IGR has a financial solvency risk score of 27/100. This shows lower leverage risk and a relatively healthy balance sheet. Interest coverage of -11.8x means earnings comfortably exceed debt service. Current ratio of 2.05x confirms strong short-term liquidity. The company appears to have flexibility to invest, return capital, or absorb unexpected shocks.

IGR scores 78/100 for operational quality, indicating high operational risk. Key concerns: a negative net margin of -13.7% — the company is loss-making; negative FCF (-0.4% FCF margin) — the business is cash burning; weak capital efficiency with 0.7% Cash ROA; moderate margin variance of ±6.2pp over 3 years. These weaknesses make the business vulnerable to cost shocks or revenue shortfalls. Monitor profitability trends closely.

IGR has a volatility risk score of 20/100. This shows lower volatility with relatively stable prices in the measured period. Beta of 0.41 indicates defensive characteristics — it moves less than the market. Lower volatility may be more compatible with conservative risk budgets, depending on portfolio context.

IGR has a market cap of £0.1B (Nano Cap), resulting in a size risk score of 80/100. As a smaller company, it faces elevated business and funding risk. Small and micro-caps have higher failure rates, less diversified revenue, and greater vulnerability to competitive threats or economic shocks. They often lack scale advantages and may struggle to access capital markets during stress. Smaller companies can experience higher dispersion of outcomes, including business failure or sustained capital impairment. Diversification is important when investing at this size.