Openbookopenbook
Openbook
EQJS
+2.46 · +7.68%
£34.46 · LSE
Invesco NASDAQ Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc GBP | US Flex-Cap Equity
Invesco Investment Management Limited · Ireland
AUM:£43.3M
#– of – in US Flex-Cap Equity ETFs
ℹ️
Reward Rating
59
Good
24.03% 1Y return
ℹ️
Risk Rating
44
Moderate
Risk Assessment
ℹ️

Educational tool only – Scores are based on historical data, holdings and expense metrics for informational purposes. This is not financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Always conduct your own research or consult a qualified financial adviser.

Market Performance

📈 Up 24.0% over the past year, reflecting strong price momentum.

Cost Efficiency

💰 Ongoing charge of 0.25% — competitive for the exposure provided.

What is EQJS?

Invesco NASDAQ Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc GBP tracks Morningstar US Market Ext NR USD, providing diversified exposure across 50 holdings. Its ongoing charge is 0.25%.

Performance Highlights

Investment Breakdown

Strong Recent Performance
EQJS delivered 24.0% over the past year. Historical returns only — past performance is not indicative of future results.
Competitive Ongoing Charge
Ongoing charge of 0.25% — reasonable for the index exposure provided.
Broadly Diversified
Top 10 holdings represent just 21.6% of the ETF — exposure spread across many positions.

Openbook Analysis

Performance: Good (59)

The scoring profile reflects moderate historical performance, with a 24.0% 1-year return (historical). The ongoing charge of 0.25% is reasonable for this exposure. Risk indicators are moderate, in line with typical market exposure (historical).

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

ETF Information
AUM£43.3M
Ongoing Charge0.25%
Dividend Yield0.00%
Holdings50
Inception DateMar 2021
DomicileIreland
Distribution–
IndexMorningstar US Market Ext NR USD
ProviderInvesco Investment Management Limited
Beta–
CategoryUS Flex-Cap Equity
CurrencyGBX
Portfolio Impact

How would EQJS affect your portfolio?

Sign in to see exactly what adding this ETF changes — sector exposure, yield, diversification, volatility. Real numbers from your actual holdings.

Sign in
Example preview
6168
+7 points · better diversified
Alternatives
Similar ETFs to compare
CSP1
iShares Core S&P 500
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.1%
AUM£78B
Yield1.3%
VUAG
Vanguard S&P 500 Acc
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.0%
AUM£12B
Yield—
SWDA
iShares MSCI World
TER 0.20%
1Y+15.4%
AUM£62B
Yield1.6%
VWRP
Vanguard FTSE All-World
TER 0.22%
1Y+14.8%
AUM£14B
Yield1.8%

Chart Tools

My Portfolio

Sign in to overlay your portfolio on the chart.

Sign in
Compare Equity
Uses ISF.L (iShares FTSE 100 ETF)
Indicators

Performance Metrics

Historical returns

6M
+20.9%
1Y
+46.0%
3Y
+68.5%
5Y
+47.8%
OpenBook InsightIf you had invested £10,000 in EQJS 5 years ago, it would have grown to £14,775 — a gain of £4,775.

Annual Returns

Calendar year performance

EQJS delivered positive returns in 4 of the last 5 calendar years.
YearEQJS
2026 YTD+20.1%
2025+10.3%
2024+17.5%
2023+7.7%
2022-18.2%
CAGR 4yr+3.4%
4/5 positive yearsAvg return: +7.5%Worst year: -18.2% (2022)

Technical Analysis Summary

Automated insights from historical price action and indicators

Technical Regime: POSITIVE
Trend Strength
100%
Positive
Volatility
19.5%
Low
Momentum
+13.0%
30-day change
Support Level
35.56
Key floor
Key Insights
  • Price is currently trading above all key moving averages.
  • Monitor key support and resistance levels as part of broader risk assessment.

Reward Rating Breakdown

Our reward rating analyses EQJS's attractiveness using 4 weighted factors. Each factor is scored 0-100, then combined using the weights shown below. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Overall Reward Rating
59
Good REWARD
Data Coverage: %
Factor Framework
Performance
Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs?
Cost Efficiency
Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods?
Income
Does it provide attractive and consistent distributions?
Diversification Quality
Does it spread exposure across holdings, sectors, and regions?

📈 Performance

Weight: 30%
55/100

Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs? Combines 1/3/5/10-year returns with the Sharpe ratio (risk-adjusted return).

1Y Return
24.03%
Very Good
3Y Return
14.99%
Very Good
5Y Return
0.00%
Weak
10Y Return
0.00%
Weak
Sharpe Ratio
—
No Data

Solid historical performance: 1-year return of 24.03%, 3-year annualised 14.99%, 5-year annualised 0.00%. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

💰 Cost Efficiency

Weight: 30%
80/100

Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods? Low ongoing charges compound into meaningful additional returns over a 10-year horizon.

Ongoing Charge
0.25%
Neutral
Net Expense Ratio
0.00%
Very Good
Annual Turnover
0.00%
Very Good
Tracking Difference
—
No Data

Low-cost and efficient structure: ongoing charge of 0.25%, net expense ratio of 0.00%, annual turnover of 0.0%.

💵 Income

Weight: 15%
Not applicable

This is an accumulating ETF. It reinvests distributions inside the fund rather than paying cash to unit-holders, so income metrics don't apply. Reward is scored on the other three factors with the 15% income weight redistributed proportionally.

🌐 Diversification Quality

Weight: 25%
39/100

Does the ETF spread exposure across many holdings, sectors, and regions? Concentrated funds can be doing exactly what they're meant to do — treat the score as context, not a verdict.

Holdings
50
Weak
Top 10 Concentration
21.62%
Good
Top Sector
Technology37.6%
Weak
Top Region
North America87.6%
Weak

Heavily concentrated — returns will be driven by a narrow slice of the market: 50 holdings, top 10 at 21.6%, Technology sector at 37.6%, North America at 87.6%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Risk Rating Breakdown

Our risk rating analyses EQJS using 4 weighted factors. A higher score indicates higher risk. This is a framework for understanding exposure — concentrated funds can still be doing exactly what they're meant to do.

Overall Risk Rating
44
Moderate RISK
Data Coverage: 75%
Factor Framework
Holdings Concentration
How much of the fund sits in its largest positions? Few dominant names mean returns ride on those companies.
Market Exposure
Geographic, sector and cyclical dependencies. High single-country or single-sector weight increases macro sensitivity.
Volatility
Historical price movement, beta and drawdowns — how sharply the fund moves relative to the market.
Income Reliability
How dependable the distribution yield is — cyclical-sector dependency and unusually high yields can flag payout risk.

🎯 Holdings Concentration

Weight: 25%
34/100

How much of the fund sits in a small number of positions? If the top holdings dominate, returns will be driven by those specific companies rather than the broader index.

Top 10 Weight
21.62%
Lower Risk
Largest Holding
4.61%
Lower Risk
Number of Holdings
50
Moderate
HHI (weight²)
54
Low Risk

Reasonable spread across positions: top 10 holdings at 21.6%, largest single position at 4.61%, 50 total holdings.

🌍 Market Exposure

Weight: 25%
68/100

How dependent is the fund on a single country, sector or economic cycle? Heavy exposure to one market means a single macro event can drive most of the return.

Top Region
North America87.6%
Elevated
Top Sector
Technology37.6%
Elevated
Top 2 Sectors
57.08%
Elevated
Cyclical Sectors
17.28%
Lower Risk

Notable regional or sector dependency: North America at 87.6%, Technology sector at 37.6%, 17.3% in cyclical sectors.

📊 Volatility

Weight: 35%
35/100

How sharply does the fund move day-to-day and how deep have its drawdowns been? High volatility means wider return outcomes over short horizons.

1Y Volatility
11.10%
Lower Risk
Beta
—
No Data
Max Drawdown
—
No Data

Moderate volatility in line with broad market: 1Y volatility of 11.10% (historical).

💵 Income Reliability

Weight: 15%
Not applicable

This is an accumulating ETF. Distributions are reinvested inside the fund, so there's no dividend-reliability risk to assess. The 15% income weight is redistributed to the other three factors.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Risk scoring is model-based and past data does not guarantee future results.
openbook

Stock research for everyday UK investors. Make smarter decisions, faster.

Questions? Email us at contact@openbookanalytics.com

© 2026 Openbook Analytics Ltd · Company No. SC843579 · Registered in Scotland

256-bit encryption GDPR compliant UK data centres

Openbook Analytics Ltd (Company No. SC843579) is registered in Scotland. Registered office: Strathclyde Inspire Hub, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills Building (Level 6), 50 Richmond Street, Glasgow, G1 1XP. Openbook Analytics is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The content on this platform is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or any other form of advice. You should not treat any content on this platform as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, and you may get back less than you invest. User-generated content, including community posts and commentary, reflects the personal opinions of individual users, is not verified for accuracy, and does not represent the views of Openbook Analytics Ltd. You should always conduct your own research or consult a qualified, FCA-regulated financial adviser before making investment decisions. Data displayed on this platform may be delayed or inaccurate and is provided "as is" without warranty. Openbook Analytics Ltd accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on the information provided.