Openbookopenbook
Openbook
TSGB
+2.13 · +6.87%
£33.18 · LSE
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF GBP | Global Large-Cap Blend Equity
VanEck Asset Management B.V. · Netherlands
AUM:£1.2B
#– of – in Global Large-Cap Blend Equity ETFs
ℹ️
Reward Rating
73
Strong
8.08% 1Y return
ℹ️
Risk Rating
43
Moderate
Risk Assessment
ℹ️

Educational tool only – Scores are based on historical data, holdings and expense metrics for informational purposes. This is not financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Always conduct your own research or consult a qualified financial adviser.

Market Performance

📈 Up 8.1% over the past year, showing positive momentum.

Cost Efficiency

💰 Ongoing charge of 0.20% — competitive for the exposure provided.

What is TSGB?

VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF GBP tracks Morningstar Global TME NR USD, providing diversified exposure across 50 holdings. Its ongoing charge is 0.20%.

Performance Highlights

Investment Breakdown

Positive 1-Year Return
TSGB returned 8.1% over the past year. Historical returns only — past performance is not indicative of future results.
Competitive Ongoing Charge
Ongoing charge of 0.20% — reasonable for the index exposure provided.
Broadly Diversified
Top 10 holdings represent just 10.0% of the ETF — exposure spread across many positions.

Openbook Analysis

Performance: Strong (73)

The scoring profile reflects strong historical performance characteristics, including a 8.1% 1-year return (historical). The ongoing charge of 0.20% is reasonable for this exposure. Risk indicators are moderate, in line with typical market exposure (historical).

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

ETF Information
AUM£1.2B
Ongoing Charge0.20%
Dividend Yield2.85%
Holdings50
Inception DateMay 2013
DomicileNetherlands
DistributionQuarterly
IndexMorningstar Global TME NR USD
ProviderVanEck Asset Management B.V.
Beta–
CategoryGlobal Large-Cap Blend Equity
CurrencyGBP
Portfolio Impact

How would TSGB affect your portfolio?

Sign in to see exactly what adding this ETF changes — sector exposure, yield, diversification, volatility. Real numbers from your actual holdings.

Sign in
Example preview
6168
+7 points · better diversified
Alternatives
Similar ETFs to compare
CSP1
iShares Core S&P 500
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.1%
AUM£78B
Yield1.3%
VUAG
Vanguard S&P 500 Acc
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.0%
AUM£12B
Yield—
SWDA
iShares MSCI World
TER 0.20%
1Y+15.4%
AUM£62B
Yield1.6%
VWRP
Vanguard FTSE All-World
TER 0.22%
1Y+14.8%
AUM£14B
Yield1.8%

Chart Tools

My Portfolio

Sign in to overlay your portfolio on the chart.

Sign in
Compare Equity
Uses ISF.L (iShares FTSE 100 ETF)
Indicators

Performance Metrics

Historical returns

6M
+13.0%
1Y
+26.2%
3Y
+57.8%
5Y
+69.4%
OpenBook InsightIf you had invested £10,000 in TSGB 5 years ago, it would have grown to £16,940 — a gain of £6,940.

Annual Returns

Calendar year performance

TSGB delivered positive returns in 4 of the last 5 calendar years.
YearTSGB
2026 YTD+11.6%
2025+15.1%
2024+10.8%
2023+13.4%
2022-7.4%
CAGR 4yr+7.6%
4/5 positive yearsAvg return: +8.7%Worst year: -7.4% (2022)

Technical Analysis Summary

Automated insights from historical price action and indicators

Technical Regime: POSITIVE
Trend Strength
100%
Positive
Volatility
11.7%
Low
Momentum
+6.6%
30-day change
Support Level
33.79
Key floor
Key Insights
  • Price is currently trading above all key moving averages.
  • Low volatility environment with a narrower recent trading range.
  • Monitor key support and resistance levels as part of broader risk assessment.

Reward Rating Breakdown

Our reward rating analyses TSGB's attractiveness using 4 weighted factors. Each factor is scored 0-100, then combined using the weights shown below. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Overall Reward Rating
73
Strong REWARD
Data Coverage: %
Factor Framework
Performance
Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs?
Cost Efficiency
Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods?
Income
Does it provide attractive and consistent distributions?
Diversification Quality
Does it spread exposure across holdings, sectors, and regions?

📈 Performance

Weight: 30%
73/100

Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs? Combines 1/3/5/10-year returns with the Sharpe ratio (risk-adjusted return).

1Y Return
8.08%
Neutral
3Y Return
13.76%
Very Good
5Y Return
10.75%
Very Good
10Y Return
11.02%
Very Good
Sharpe Ratio
—
No Data

Strong historical performance profile: 1-year return of 8.08%, 3-year annualised 13.76%, 5-year annualised 10.75%. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

💰 Cost Efficiency

Weight: 30%
85/100

Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods? Low ongoing charges compound into meaningful additional returns over a 10-year horizon.

Ongoing Charge
0.20%
Good
Net Expense Ratio
0.00%
Very Good
Annual Turnover
0.33%
Very Good
Tracking Difference
—
No Data

Low-cost and efficient structure: ongoing charge of 0.20%, net expense ratio of 0.00%, annual turnover of 0.3%.

💵 Income

Weight: 15%
70/100

Does the ETF provide attractive and consistent distributions? Combines the current yield with distribution frequency.

Distribution Yield
2.85%
Neutral
Distribution Frequency
Quarterly
Good

Attractive income profile: distribution yield of 2.85%, quarterly distributions.

🌐 Diversification Quality

Weight: 25%
60/100

Does the ETF spread exposure across many holdings, sectors, and regions? Concentrated funds can be doing exactly what they're meant to do — treat the score as context, not a verdict.

Holdings
50
Weak
Top 10 Concentration
10.04%
Very Good
Top Sector
Financial Services29.6%
Neutral
Top Region
North America38.6%
Very Good

Moderate diversification: 50 holdings, top 10 at 10.0%, Financial Services sector at 29.6%, North America at 38.6%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Risk Rating Breakdown

Our risk rating analyses TSGB using 4 weighted factors. A higher score indicates higher risk. This is a framework for understanding exposure — concentrated funds can still be doing exactly what they're meant to do.

Overall Risk Rating
43
Moderate RISK
Data Coverage: 83%
Factor Framework
Holdings Concentration
How much of the fund sits in its largest positions? Few dominant names mean returns ride on those companies.
Market Exposure
Geographic, sector and cyclical dependencies. High single-country or single-sector weight increases macro sensitivity.
Volatility
Historical price movement, beta and drawdowns — how sharply the fund moves relative to the market.
Income Reliability
How dependable the distribution yield is — cyclical-sector dependency and unusually high yields can flag payout risk.

🎯 Holdings Concentration

Weight: 25%
28/100

How much of the fund sits in a small number of positions? If the top holdings dominate, returns will be driven by those specific companies rather than the broader index.

Top 10 Weight
10.04%
Low Risk
Largest Holding
1.76%
Lower Risk
Number of Holdings
50
Moderate
HHI (weight²)
11
Low Risk

Broadly diversified across holdings: top 10 holdings at 10.0%, largest single position at 1.76%, 50 total holdings.

🌍 Market Exposure

Weight: 25%
59/100

How dependent is the fund on a single country, sector or economic cycle? Heavy exposure to one market means a single macro event can drive most of the return.

Top Region
North America38.6%
Lower Risk
Top Sector
Financial Services29.6%
Moderate
Top 2 Sectors
54.31%
Elevated
Cyclical Sectors
46.74%
Elevated

Notable regional or sector dependency: North America at 38.6%, Financial Services sector at 29.6%, 46.7% in cyclical sectors.

📊 Volatility

Weight: 35%
35/100

How sharply does the fund move day-to-day and how deep have its drawdowns been? High volatility means wider return outcomes over short horizons.

1Y Volatility
11.06%
Lower Risk
Beta
—
No Data
Max Drawdown
—
No Data

Moderate volatility in line with broad market: 1Y volatility of 11.06% (historical).

💵 Income Reliability

Weight: 15%
60/100

How dependable is the fund's distribution yield? Heavy cyclical-sector exposure or unusually high yields can flag vulnerability to dividend cuts in a downturn.

Current Yield
2.85%
Lower Risk
Cyclical Sector Exposure
46.74%
Elevated
Top-Sector Dependency
Financial Services29.6%
Moderate

Income has some cyclical dependency: yield of 2.85%, 46.7% in cyclical sectors (financials, energy, materials, industrials, real estate), Financial Services sector at 29.6%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Risk scoring is model-based and past data does not guarantee future results.
openbook

Stock research for everyday UK investors. Make smarter decisions, faster.

Questions? Email us at contact@openbookanalytics.com

© 2026 Openbook Analytics Ltd · Company No. SC843579 · Registered in Scotland

256-bit encryption GDPR compliant UK data centres

Openbook Analytics Ltd (Company No. SC843579) is registered in Scotland. Registered office: Strathclyde Inspire Hub, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills Building (Level 6), 50 Richmond Street, Glasgow, G1 1XP. Openbook Analytics is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The content on this platform is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or any other form of advice. You should not treat any content on this platform as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, and you may get back less than you invest. User-generated content, including community posts and commentary, reflects the personal opinions of individual users, is not verified for accuracy, and does not represent the views of Openbook Analytics Ltd. You should always conduct your own research or consult a qualified, FCA-regulated financial adviser before making investment decisions. Data displayed on this platform may be delayed or inaccurate and is provided "as is" without warranty. Openbook Analytics Ltd accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on the information provided.