UC90
+10.10 · +7.59%
£143.26 · LSE
UBS (Irl) Fund Solutions plc - CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF | Commodities - Broad Basket
UBS Fund Management (Ireland) Ltd. · Ireland
AUM:£11.3M
#– of – in Commodities - Broad Basket ETFs
ℹ️
Reward Rating
58
Good
14.20% 1Y return
ℹ️
Risk Rating
32
Moderate
Risk Assessment
ℹ️

Educational tool only – Scores are based on historical data, holdings and expense metrics for informational purposes. This is not financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Always conduct your own research or consult a qualified financial adviser.

Market Performance

📈 Up 14.2% over the past year, showing positive momentum.

Cost Efficiency

💰 Ongoing charge of 0.30% — competitive for the exposure provided.

What is UC90?

UBS (Irl) Fund Solutions plc - CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF tracks its benchmark index, providing diversified exposure across 136 holdings. Its ongoing charge is 0.30%.

Performance Highlights

Investment Breakdown

Positive 1-Year Return
UC90 returned 14.2% over the past year. Historical returns only — past performance is not indicative of future results.
Competitive Ongoing Charge
Ongoing charge of 0.30% — reasonable for the index exposure provided.
Moderate Concentration
Top 10 holdings make up 45.3% of the ETF — a moderate level of name concentration.

Openbook Analysis

Performance: Good (58)

The scoring profile reflects moderate historical performance, with a 14.2% 1-year return (historical). The ongoing charge of 0.30% is reasonable for this exposure. Risk indicators are moderate, in line with typical market exposure (historical).

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

ETF Information
AUM£11.3M
Ongoing Charge0.30%
Dividend Yield0.00%
Holdings136
Inception DateMar 2015
DomicileIreland
DistributionNA
Index
ProviderUBS Fund Management (Ireland) Ltd.
Beta
CategoryCommodities - Broad Basket
CurrencyGBX
Portfolio Impact

How would UC90 affect your portfolio?

Sign in to see exactly what adding this ETF changes — sector exposure, yield, diversification, volatility. Real numbers from your actual holdings.

Sign in
Example preview
6168
+7 points · better diversified
Alternatives
Similar ETFs to compare
CSP1
iShares Core S&P 500
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.1%
AUM£78B
Yield1.3%
VUAG
Vanguard S&P 500 Acc
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.0%
AUM£12B
Yield
SWDA
iShares MSCI World
TER 0.20%
1Y+15.4%
AUM£62B
Yield1.6%
VWRP
Vanguard FTSE All-World
TER 0.22%
1Y+14.8%
AUM£14B
Yield1.8%

Chart Tools

Sign in to overlay your portfolio on the chart.

Sign in
Uses ISF.L (iShares FTSE 100 ETF)
Indicators

Performance Metrics

Historical returns

6M
+22.7%
1Y
+31.9%
3Y
+46.5%
5Y
+69.1%
OpenBook InsightIf you had invested £10,000 in UC90 5 years ago, it would have grown to £16,908 — a gain of £6,908.

Annual Returns

Calendar year performance

UC90 delivered positive returns in 4 of the last 5 calendar years.
YearUC90
2026 YTD+22.3%
2025+8.7%
2024+5.6%
2023-0.9%
2022+13.6%
CAGR 4yr+6.6%
4/5 positive yearsAvg return: +9.8%Worst year: -0.9% (2023)

Technical Analysis Summary

Automated insights from historical price action and indicators

Technical Regime: MIXED
Trend Strength
67%
Positive
Volatility
16.1%
Low
Momentum
+2.2%
30-day change
Support Level
178.40
Key floor
Key Insights
  • Price is consolidating, with low momentum over the recent period.
  • Monitor key support and resistance levels as part of broader risk assessment.

Reward Rating Breakdown

Our reward rating analyses UC90's attractiveness using 4 weighted factors. Each factor is scored 0-100, then combined using the weights shown below. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Overall Reward Rating
58
Good REWARD
Data Coverage: %
Factor Framework
Performance
Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs?
Cost Efficiency
Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods?
Income
Does it provide attractive and consistent distributions?
Diversification Quality
Does it spread exposure across holdings, sectors, and regions?

📈 Performance

Weight: 30%
65/100

Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs? Combines 1/3/5/10-year returns with the Sharpe ratio (risk-adjusted return).

1Y Return
14.20%
Good
3Y Return
6.67%
Neutral
5Y Return
10.27%
Very Good
10Y Return
7.33%
Good
Sharpe Ratio
No Data

Solid historical performance: 1-year return of 14.20%, 3-year annualised 6.67%, 5-year annualised 10.27%. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

💰 Cost Efficiency

Weight: 30%
80/100

Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods? Low ongoing charges compound into meaningful additional returns over a 10-year horizon.

Ongoing Charge
0.30%
Neutral
Net Expense Ratio
0.00%
Very Good
Annual Turnover
0.00%
Very Good
Tracking Difference
No Data

Low-cost and efficient structure: ongoing charge of 0.30%, net expense ratio of 0.00%, annual turnover of 0.0%.

💵 Income

Weight: 15%
15/100

Does the ETF provide attractive and consistent distributions? Combines the current yield with distribution frequency.

Distribution Yield
0.00%
Very Weak
Distribution Frequency
NA
No Data

Low-income profile — better suited as a growth holding: distribution yield of 0.00%, na distributions.

🌐 Diversification Quality

Weight: 25%
50/100

Does the ETF spread exposure across many holdings, sectors, and regions? Concentrated funds can be doing exactly what they're meant to do — treat the score as context, not a verdict.

Holdings
136
Neutral
Top 10 Concentration
45.28%
Weak
Top Sector
No Data
Top Region
No Data

Concentrated but typical for its category: 136 holdings, top 10 at 45.3%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Risk Rating Breakdown

Our risk rating analyses UC90 using 4 weighted factors. A higher score indicates higher risk. This is a framework for understanding exposure — concentrated funds can still be doing exactly what they're meant to do.

Overall Risk Rating
32
Moderate RISK
Data Coverage: 42%
Factor Framework
Holdings Concentration
How much of the fund sits in its largest positions? Few dominant names mean returns ride on those companies.
Market Exposure
Geographic, sector and cyclical dependencies. High single-country or single-sector weight increases macro sensitivity.
Volatility
Historical price movement, beta and drawdowns — how sharply the fund moves relative to the market.
Income Reliability
How dependable the distribution yield is — cyclical-sector dependency and unusually high yields can flag payout risk.

🎯 Holdings Concentration

Weight: 25%
48/100

How much of the fund sits in a small number of positions? If the top holdings dominate, returns will be driven by those specific companies rather than the broader index.

Top 10 Weight
45.28%
Moderate
Largest Holding
9.67%
Moderate
Number of Holdings
136
Lower Risk
HHI (weight²)
251
Low Risk

Reasonable spread across positions: top 10 holdings at 45.3%, largest single position at 9.67%, 136 total holdings.

🌍 Market Exposure

Weight: 25%
0/100

How dependent is the fund on a single country, sector or economic cycle? Heavy exposure to one market means a single macro event can drive most of the return.

Top Region
Low Risk
Top Sector
Low Risk
Top 2 Sectors
0.00%
Low Risk
Cyclical Sectors
0.00%
Low Risk

Insufficient exposure data available.

📊 Volatility

Weight: 35%
20/100

How sharply does the fund move day-to-day and how deep have its drawdowns been? High volatility means wider return outcomes over short horizons.

1Y Volatility
8.57%
Lower Risk
Beta
No Data
Max Drawdown
No Data

Below-average volatility: 1Y volatility of 8.57% (historical).

💵 Income Reliability

Weight: 15%
Not applicable

This is an accumulating ETF. Distributions are reinvested inside the fund, so there's no dividend-reliability risk to assess. The 15% income weight is redistributed to the other three factors.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Risk scoring is model-based and past data does not guarantee future results.