Openbookopenbook
Openbook
XDJP
-22.63 · -46.00%
£26.57 · LSE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | Japan Large-Cap Blend Equity
DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) · Luxembourg
AUM:£336.5B
#– of – in Japan Large-Cap Blend Equity ETFs
ℹ️
Reward Rating
72
Strong
58.71% 1Y return
ℹ️
Risk Rating
64
Elevated
Risk Assessment
ℹ️

Educational tool only – Scores are based on historical data, holdings and expense metrics for informational purposes. This is not financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Always conduct your own research or consult a qualified financial adviser.

Market Performance

📈 Up 58.7% over the past year, reflecting strong price momentum.

Cost Efficiency

💰 Ongoing charge of 0.10% — among the lowest available for this category.

What is XDJP?

The aim is for the investment to reflect the performance of the Nikkei Stock Average Index (Index) which is designed to reflect the performance of the Japanese stock market, specifically the 225 stocks listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange First Section. The shares of the companies comprised in the Index are reviewed periodically by the liquidity in the market and sector balance.

Performance Highlights

Investment Breakdown

Strong Recent Performance
XDJP delivered 58.7% over the past year. Historical returns only — past performance is not indicative of future results.
Ultra-Low Ongoing Charge
Ongoing charge of 0.10% — among the lowest available. Low costs compound favourably over long holding periods.
Moderate Concentration
Top 10 holdings make up 46.3% of the ETF — a moderate level of name concentration.

Openbook Analysis

Performance: Strong (72)

The scoring profile reflects strong historical performance characteristics, including a 58.7% 1-year return (historical). The ongoing charge of 0.10% is very competitive. Risk indicators are elevated — volatility warrants consideration (historical).

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

ETF Information
AUM£336.5B
Ongoing Charge0.10%
Dividend Yield2.76%
Holdings50
Inception DateJan 2013
DomicileLuxembourg
DistributionHalf-yearly
IndexMorningstar Japan TME NR JPY
ProviderDWS Investment S.A. (ETF)
Beta–
CategoryJapan Large-Cap Blend Equity
CurrencyGBX
Portfolio Impact

How would XDJP affect your portfolio?

Sign in to see exactly what adding this ETF changes — sector exposure, yield, diversification, volatility. Real numbers from your actual holdings.

Sign in
Example preview
6168
+7 points · better diversified
Alternatives
Similar ETFs to compare
CSP1
iShares Core S&P 500
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.1%
AUM£78B
Yield1.3%
VUAG
Vanguard S&P 500 Acc
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.0%
AUM£12B
Yield—
SWDA
iShares MSCI World
TER 0.20%
1Y+15.4%
AUM£62B
Yield1.6%
VWRP
Vanguard FTSE All-World
TER 0.22%
1Y+14.8%
AUM£14B
Yield1.8%

Chart Tools

My Portfolio

Sign in to overlay your portfolio on the chart.

Sign in
Compare Equity
Uses ISF.L (iShares FTSE 100 ETF)
Indicators

Performance Metrics

Historical returns

6M
+27.6%
1Y
+58.4%
3Y
+77.4%
5Y
+76.6%
OpenBook InsightIf you had invested £10,000 in XDJP 5 years ago, it would have grown to £17,663 — a gain of £7,663.

Annual Returns

Calendar year performance

XDJP delivered positive returns in 4 of the last 5 calendar years.
YearXDJP
2026 YTD+28.7%
2025+18.7%
2024+9.4%
2023+14.6%
2022-10.7%
CAGR 4yr+7.3%
4/5 positive yearsAvg return: +12.1%Worst year: -10.7% (2022)

Technical Analysis Summary

Automated insights from historical price action and indicators

Technical Regime: POSITIVE
Trend Strength
100%
Positive
Volatility
22.0%
Moderate
Momentum
+12.5%
30-day change
Support Level
28.88
Key floor
Key Insights
  • Price is currently trading above all key moving averages.
  • Monitor key support and resistance levels as part of broader risk assessment.

Reward Rating Breakdown

Our reward rating analyses XDJP's attractiveness using 4 weighted factors. Each factor is scored 0-100, then combined using the weights shown below. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Overall Reward Rating
72
Strong REWARD
Data Coverage: %
Factor Framework
Performance
Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs?
Cost Efficiency
Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods?
Income
Does it provide attractive and consistent distributions?
Diversification Quality
Does it spread exposure across holdings, sectors, and regions?

📈 Performance

Weight: 30%
88/100

Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs? Combines 1/3/5/10-year returns with the Sharpe ratio (risk-adjusted return).

1Y Return
58.71%
Very Good
3Y Return
30.72%
Very Good
5Y Return
16.72%
Very Good
10Y Return
7.56%
Good
Sharpe Ratio
—
No Data

Strong historical performance profile: 1-year return of 58.71%, 3-year annualised 30.72%, 5-year annualised 16.72%. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

💰 Cost Efficiency

Weight: 30%
90/100

Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods? Low ongoing charges compound into meaningful additional returns over a 10-year horizon.

Ongoing Charge
0.10%
Very Good
Net Expense Ratio
0.00%
Very Good
Annual Turnover
0.02%
Very Good
Tracking Difference
—
No Data

Low-cost and efficient structure: ongoing charge of 0.10%, net expense ratio of 0.00%, annual turnover of 0.0%.

💵 Income

Weight: 15%
65/100

Does the ETF provide attractive and consistent distributions? Combines the current yield with distribution frequency.

Distribution Yield
2.76%
Neutral
Distribution Frequency
Half-yearly
No Data

Reasonable income characteristics: distribution yield of 2.76%, half-yearly distributions.

🌐 Diversification Quality

Weight: 25%
36/100

Does the ETF spread exposure across many holdings, sectors, and regions? Concentrated funds can be doing exactly what they're meant to do — treat the score as context, not a verdict.

Holdings
50
Weak
Top 10 Concentration
46.29%
Weak
Top Sector
Technology30.9%
Weak
Top Region
Japan100.0%
Very Weak

Heavily concentrated — returns will be driven by a narrow slice of the market: 50 holdings, top 10 at 46.3%, Technology sector at 30.9%, Japan at 100.0%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Risk Rating Breakdown

Our risk rating analyses XDJP using 4 weighted factors. A higher score indicates higher risk. This is a framework for understanding exposure — concentrated funds can still be doing exactly what they're meant to do.

Overall Risk Rating
64
Elevated RISK
Data Coverage: 83%
Factor Framework
Holdings Concentration
How much of the fund sits in its largest positions? Few dominant names mean returns ride on those companies.
Market Exposure
Geographic, sector and cyclical dependencies. High single-country or single-sector weight increases macro sensitivity.
Volatility
Historical price movement, beta and drawdowns — how sharply the fund moves relative to the market.
Income Reliability
How dependable the distribution yield is — cyclical-sector dependency and unusually high yields can flag payout risk.

🎯 Holdings Concentration

Weight: 25%
59/100

How much of the fund sits in a small number of positions? If the top holdings dominate, returns will be driven by those specific companies rather than the broader index.

Top 10 Weight
46.29%
Moderate
Largest Holding
12.77%
Elevated
Number of Holdings
50
Moderate
HHI (weight²)
361
Low Risk

Moderate holdings concentration: top 10 holdings at 46.3%, largest single position at 12.77%, 50 total holdings.

🌍 Market Exposure

Weight: 25%
67/100

How dependent is the fund on a single country, sector or economic cycle? Heavy exposure to one market means a single macro event can drive most of the return.

Top Region
Japan100.0%
High Risk
Top Sector
Technology30.9%
Elevated
Top 2 Sectors
49.62%
Elevated
Cyclical Sectors
27.93%
Lower Risk

Notable regional or sector dependency: Japan at 100.0%, Technology sector at 30.9%, 27.9% in cyclical sectors.

📊 Volatility

Weight: 35%
72/100

How sharply does the fund move day-to-day and how deep have its drawdowns been? High volatility means wider return outcomes over short horizons.

1Y Volatility
19.94%
Moderate
Beta
—
No Data
Max Drawdown
—
No Data

High historical volatility — expect meaningful short-term swings: 1Y volatility of 19.94% (historical).

💵 Income Reliability

Weight: 15%
47/100

How dependable is the fund's distribution yield? Heavy cyclical-sector exposure or unusually high yields can flag vulnerability to dividend cuts in a downturn.

Current Yield
2.76%
Lower Risk
Cyclical Sector Exposure
27.93%
Lower Risk
Top-Sector Dependency
Technology30.9%
Elevated

Income profile is reasonably diversified: yield of 2.76%, 27.9% in cyclical sectors (financials, energy, materials, industrials, real estate), Technology sector at 30.9%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Risk scoring is model-based and past data does not guarantee future results.
openbook

Stock research for everyday UK investors. Make smarter decisions, faster.

Questions? Email us at contact@openbookanalytics.com

© 2026 Openbook Analytics Ltd · Company No. SC843579 · Registered in Scotland

256-bit encryption GDPR compliant UK data centres

Openbook Analytics Ltd (Company No. SC843579) is registered in Scotland. Registered office: Strathclyde Inspire Hub, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills Building (Level 6), 50 Richmond Street, Glasgow, G1 1XP. Openbook Analytics is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The content on this platform is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or any other form of advice. You should not treat any content on this platform as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, and you may get back less than you invest. User-generated content, including community posts and commentary, reflects the personal opinions of individual users, is not verified for accuracy, and does not represent the views of Openbook Analytics Ltd. You should always conduct your own research or consult a qualified, FCA-regulated financial adviser before making investment decisions. Data displayed on this platform may be delayed or inaccurate and is provided "as is" without warranty. Openbook Analytics Ltd accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on the information provided.