XFVT
+3.02 · +10.98%
£30.54 · LSE
Xtrackers FTSE Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C GBP | Vietnam Equity
DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) · UK
AUM:£352.8M
#– of – in Vietnam Equity ETFs
ℹ️
Reward Rating
58
Good
53.87% 1Y return
ℹ️
Risk Rating
67
Elevated
Risk Assessment
ℹ️

Educational tool only – Scores are based on historical data, holdings and expense metrics for informational purposes. This is not financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Always conduct your own research or consult a qualified financial adviser.

Market Performance

📈 Up 53.9% over the past year, reflecting strong price momentum.

Cost Efficiency

⚠️ Ongoing charge of 0.85% — above average for this category.

What is XFVT?

Xtrackers FTSE Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C GBP tracks Vietnam VN Index, providing diversified exposure across 46 holdings. Its ongoing charge is 0.85%.

Performance Highlights

Investment Breakdown

Strong Recent Performance
XFVT delivered 53.9% over the past year. Historical returns only — past performance is not indicative of future results.
Higher Cost Profile
Ongoing charge of 0.85% is above average. Verify whether the strategy justifies the cost.
Moderate Concentration
Top 10 holdings make up 40.7% of the ETF — a moderate level of name concentration.

Openbook Analysis

Performance: Good (58)

The scoring profile reflects moderate historical performance, with a 53.9% 1-year return (historical). The ongoing charge of 0.85% should be considered against long-term return expectations. Risk indicators are elevated — volatility warrants consideration (historical).

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

ETF Information
AUM£352.8M
Ongoing Charge0.85%
Dividend Yield3.12%
Holdings46
Inception DateJan 2008
Domicile
Distribution
IndexVietnam VN Index
ProviderDWS Investment S.A. (ETF)
Beta
CategoryVietnam Equity
CurrencyGBX
Portfolio Impact

How would XFVT affect your portfolio?

Sign in to see exactly what adding this ETF changes — sector exposure, yield, diversification, volatility. Real numbers from your actual holdings.

Sign in
Example preview
6168
+7 points · better diversified
Alternatives
Similar ETFs to compare
CSP1
iShares Core S&P 500
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.1%
AUM£78B
Yield1.3%
VUAG
Vanguard S&P 500 Acc
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.0%
AUM£12B
Yield
SWDA
iShares MSCI World
TER 0.20%
1Y+15.4%
AUM£62B
Yield1.6%
VWRP
Vanguard FTSE All-World
TER 0.22%
1Y+14.8%
AUM£14B
Yield1.8%

Chart Tools

Sign in to overlay your portfolio on the chart.

Sign in
Uses ISF.L (iShares FTSE 100 ETF)
Indicators

Performance Metrics

Historical returns

6M
+5.0%
1Y
+52.0%
3Y
+42.6%
5Y
+3.4%
OpenBook InsightIf you had invested £10,000 in XFVT 5 years ago, it would have grown to £10,342 — a gain of £342.

Annual Returns

Calendar year performance

XFVT delivered positive returns in 1 of the last 5 calendar years.
YearXFVT
2026 YTD-0.2%
2025+55.1%
2024-8.9%
2023-5.5%
2022-39.7%
CAGR 4yr-5.3%
1/5 positive yearsAvg return: +0.2%Worst year: -39.7% (2022)

Technical Analysis Summary

Automated insights from historical price action and indicators

Technical Regime: MIXED
Trend Strength
67%
Positive
Volatility
21.1%
Moderate
Momentum
+1.2%
30-day change
Support Level
30.98
Key floor
Key Insights
  • Price is consolidating, with low momentum over the recent period.
  • Monitor key support and resistance levels as part of broader risk assessment.

Reward Rating Breakdown

Our reward rating analyses XFVT's attractiveness using 4 weighted factors. Each factor is scored 0-100, then combined using the weights shown below. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Overall Reward Rating
58
Good REWARD
Data Coverage: %
Factor Framework
Performance
Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs?
Cost Efficiency
Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods?
Income
Does it provide attractive and consistent distributions?
Diversification Quality
Does it spread exposure across holdings, sectors, and regions?

📈 Performance

Weight: 30%
64/100

Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs? Combines 1/3/5/10-year returns with the Sharpe ratio (risk-adjusted return).

1Y Return
53.87%
Very Good
3Y Return
13.28%
Very Good
5Y Return
2.22%
Weak
10Y Return
6.84%
Neutral
Sharpe Ratio
No Data

Solid historical performance: 1-year return of 53.87%, 3-year annualised 13.28%, 5-year annualised 2.22%. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

💰 Cost Efficiency

Weight: 30%
68/100

Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods? Low ongoing charges compound into meaningful additional returns over a 10-year horizon.

Ongoing Charge
0.85%
Very Weak
Net Expense Ratio
0.01%
Very Good
Annual Turnover
-0.68%
Very Good
Tracking Difference
No Data

Reasonable cost profile: ongoing charge of 0.85%, net expense ratio of 0.01%, annual turnover of -0.7%.

💵 Income

Weight: 15%
65/100

Does the ETF provide attractive and consistent distributions? Combines the current yield with distribution frequency.

Distribution Yield
3.12%
Neutral
Distribution Frequency
No Data

Reasonable income characteristics: distribution yield of 3.12%.

🌐 Diversification Quality

Weight: 25%
36/100

Does the ETF spread exposure across many holdings, sectors, and regions? Concentrated funds can be doing exactly what they're meant to do — treat the score as context, not a verdict.

Holdings
46
Very Weak
Top 10 Concentration
40.75%
Weak
Top Sector
Technology27.9%
Neutral
Top Region
North America99.9%
Very Weak

Heavily concentrated — returns will be driven by a narrow slice of the market: 46 holdings, top 10 at 40.7%, Technology sector at 27.9%, North America at 99.9%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Risk Rating Breakdown

Our risk rating analyses XFVT using 4 weighted factors. A higher score indicates higher risk. This is a framework for understanding exposure — concentrated funds can still be doing exactly what they're meant to do.

Overall Risk Rating
67
Elevated RISK
Data Coverage: 83%
Factor Framework
Holdings Concentration
How much of the fund sits in its largest positions? Few dominant names mean returns ride on those companies.
Market Exposure
Geographic, sector and cyclical dependencies. High single-country or single-sector weight increases macro sensitivity.
Volatility
Historical price movement, beta and drawdowns — how sharply the fund moves relative to the market.
Income Reliability
How dependable the distribution yield is — cyclical-sector dependency and unusually high yields can flag payout risk.

🎯 Holdings Concentration

Weight: 25%
48/100

How much of the fund sits in a small number of positions? If the top holdings dominate, returns will be driven by those specific companies rather than the broader index.

Top 10 Weight
40.75%
Moderate
Largest Holding
6.36%
Moderate
Number of Holdings
46
Elevated
HHI (weight²)
175
Low Risk

Reasonable spread across positions: top 10 holdings at 40.7%, largest single position at 6.36%, 46 total holdings.

🌍 Market Exposure

Weight: 25%
67/100

How dependent is the fund on a single country, sector or economic cycle? Heavy exposure to one market means a single macro event can drive most of the return.

Top Region
North America99.9%
High Risk
Top Sector
Technology27.9%
Moderate
Top 2 Sectors
44.48%
Moderate
Cyclical Sectors
23.82%
Lower Risk

Notable regional or sector dependency: North America at 99.9%, Technology sector at 27.9%, 23.8% in cyclical sectors.

📊 Volatility

Weight: 35%
90/100

How sharply does the fund move day-to-day and how deep have its drawdowns been? High volatility means wider return outcomes over short horizons.

1Y Volatility
26.09%
Elevated
Beta
No Data
Max Drawdown
No Data

High historical volatility — expect meaningful short-term swings: 1Y volatility of 26.09% (historical).

💵 Income Reliability

Weight: 15%
47/100

How dependable is the fund's distribution yield? Heavy cyclical-sector exposure or unusually high yields can flag vulnerability to dividend cuts in a downturn.

Current Yield
3.12%
Lower Risk
Cyclical Sector Exposure
23.82%
Lower Risk
Top-Sector Dependency
Technology27.9%
Moderate

Income profile is reasonably diversified: yield of 3.12%, 23.8% in cyclical sectors (financials, energy, materials, industrials, real estate), Technology sector at 27.9%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Risk scoring is model-based and past data does not guarantee future results.