XMES
+1.23 · +15.83%
£8.97 · LSE
Xtrackers - MSCI Mexico UCITS ETF | Other Equity
DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) · Luxembourg
AUM:$357.8M
#– of – in Other Equity ETFs
ℹ️
Reward Rating
55
Good
67.47% 1Y return
ℹ️
Risk Rating
70
High
Risk Assessment
ℹ️

Educational tool only – Scores are based on historical data, holdings and expense metrics for informational purposes. This is not financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Always conduct your own research or consult a qualified financial adviser.

Market Performance

📈 Up 67.5% over the past year, reflecting strong price momentum.

Cost Efficiency

Ongoing charge of 0.65% — moderate cost. Consider how fees compound over long holding periods.

What is XMES?

Xtrackers - MSCI Mexico UCITS ETF tracks its benchmark index, providing diversified exposure across 22 holdings. Its ongoing charge is 0.65%.

Performance Highlights

Investment Breakdown

Strong Recent Performance
XMES delivered 67.5% over the past year. Historical returns only — past performance is not indicative of future results.
Moderate Cost
Ongoing charge of 0.65%. Consider how fees compound over a long holding period.
Concentrated Holdings
Top 10 holdings account for 78.6% of the ETF — significant weight in a small number of names.

Openbook Analysis

Performance: Good (55)

The scoring profile reflects moderate historical performance, with a 67.5% 1-year return (historical). The ongoing charge of 0.65% should be considered against long-term return expectations. Risk indicators are elevated — volatility warrants consideration (historical).

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

ETF Information
AUM$357.8M
Ongoing Charge0.65%
Dividend Yield0.00%
Holdings22
Inception DateMar 2010
DomicileLuxembourg
DistributionNA
Index
ProviderDWS Investment S.A. (ETF)
Beta
CategoryOther Equity
CurrencyUSD
Portfolio Impact

How would XMES affect your portfolio?

Sign in to see exactly what adding this ETF changes — sector exposure, yield, diversification, volatility. Real numbers from your actual holdings.

Sign in
Example preview
6168
+7 points · better diversified
Alternatives
Similar ETFs to compare
CSP1
iShares Core S&P 500
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.1%
AUM£78B
Yield1.3%
VUAG
Vanguard S&P 500 Acc
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.0%
AUM£12B
Yield
SWDA
iShares MSCI World
TER 0.20%
1Y+15.4%
AUM£62B
Yield1.6%
VWRP
Vanguard FTSE All-World
TER 0.22%
1Y+14.8%
AUM£14B
Yield1.8%

Chart Tools

Sign in to overlay your portfolio on the chart.

Sign in
Uses ISF.L (iShares FTSE 100 ETF)
Indicators

Performance Metrics

Historical returns

6M
+17.0%
1Y
+34.4%
3Y
+46.2%
5Y
+87.0%
OpenBook InsightIf you had invested £10,000 in XMES 5 years ago, it would have grown to £18,703 — a gain of £8,703.

Annual Returns

Calendar year performance

XMES delivered positive returns in 3 of the last 5 calendar years.
YearXMES
2026 YTD+11.6%
2025+53.4%
2024-27.2%
2023+37.8%
2022-0.5%
CAGR 4yr+11.3%
3/5 positive yearsAvg return: +15.0%Worst year: -27.2% (2024)

Technical Analysis Summary

Automated insights from historical price action and indicators

Technical Regime: MIXED
Trend Strength
67%
Positive
Volatility
23.4%
Moderate
Momentum
-0.9%
30-day change
Support Level
9.00
Key floor
Key Insights
  • Price is consolidating, with low momentum over the recent period.
  • Monitor key support and resistance levels as part of broader risk assessment.

Reward Rating Breakdown

Our reward rating analyses XMES's attractiveness using 4 weighted factors. Each factor is scored 0-100, then combined using the weights shown below. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Overall Reward Rating
55
Good REWARD
Data Coverage: %
Factor Framework
Performance
Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs?
Cost Efficiency
Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods?
Income
Does it provide attractive and consistent distributions?
Diversification Quality
Does it spread exposure across holdings, sectors, and regions?

📈 Performance

Weight: 30%
84/100

Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs? Combines 1/3/5/10-year returns with the Sharpe ratio (risk-adjusted return).

1Y Return
67.47%
Very Good
3Y Return
16.70%
Very Good
5Y Return
18.00%
Very Good
10Y Return
7.96%
Good
Sharpe Ratio
No Data

Strong historical performance profile: 1-year return of 67.47%, 3-year annualised 16.70%, 5-year annualised 18.00%. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

💰 Cost Efficiency

Weight: 30%
73/100

Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods? Low ongoing charges compound into meaningful additional returns over a 10-year horizon.

Ongoing Charge
0.65%
Very Weak
Net Expense Ratio
0.01%
Very Good
Annual Turnover
0.72%
Very Good
Tracking Difference
No Data

Low-cost and efficient structure: ongoing charge of 0.65%, net expense ratio of 0.01%, annual turnover of 0.7%.

💵 Income

Weight: 15%
15/100

Does the ETF provide attractive and consistent distributions? Combines the current yield with distribution frequency.

Distribution Yield
0.00%
Very Weak
Distribution Frequency
NA
No Data

Low-income profile — better suited as a growth holding: distribution yield of 0.00%, na distributions.

🌐 Diversification Quality

Weight: 25%
24/100

Does the ETF spread exposure across many holdings, sectors, and regions? Concentrated funds can be doing exactly what they're meant to do — treat the score as context, not a verdict.

Holdings
22
Very Weak
Top 10 Concentration
78.62%
Very Weak
Top Sector
Basic Materials30.1%
Weak
Top Region
Latin America100.0%
Very Weak

Heavily concentrated — returns will be driven by a narrow slice of the market: 22 holdings, top 10 at 78.6%, Basic Materials sector at 30.1%, Latin America at 100.0%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Risk Rating Breakdown

Our risk rating analyses XMES using 4 weighted factors. A higher score indicates higher risk. This is a framework for understanding exposure — concentrated funds can still be doing exactly what they're meant to do.

Overall Risk Rating
70
High RISK
Data Coverage: 75%
Factor Framework
Holdings Concentration
How much of the fund sits in its largest positions? Few dominant names mean returns ride on those companies.
Market Exposure
Geographic, sector and cyclical dependencies. High single-country or single-sector weight increases macro sensitivity.
Volatility
Historical price movement, beta and drawdowns — how sharply the fund moves relative to the market.
Income Reliability
How dependable the distribution yield is — cyclical-sector dependency and unusually high yields can flag payout risk.

🎯 Holdings Concentration

Weight: 25%
76/100

How much of the fund sits in a small number of positions? If the top holdings dominate, returns will be driven by those specific companies rather than the broader index.

Top 10 Weight
78.62%
High Risk
Largest Holding
16.05%
High Risk
Number of Holdings
22
High Risk
HHI (weight²)
783
Lower Risk

Holdings-level concentration is high: top 10 holdings at 78.6%, largest single position at 16.05%, 22 total holdings.

🌍 Market Exposure

Weight: 25%
86/100

How dependent is the fund on a single country, sector or economic cycle? Heavy exposure to one market means a single macro event can drive most of the return.

Top Region
Latin America100.0%
High Risk
Top Sector
Basic Materials30.1%
Elevated
Top 2 Sectors
59.03%
Elevated
Cyclical Sectors
62.42%
High Risk

High market-exposure risk — returns closely track a narrow slice of the market: Latin America at 100.0%, Basic Materials sector at 30.1%, 62.4% in cyclical sectors.

📊 Volatility

Weight: 35%
55/100

How sharply does the fund move day-to-day and how deep have its drawdowns been? High volatility means wider return outcomes over short horizons.

1Y Volatility
14.84%
Lower Risk
Beta
No Data
Max Drawdown
No Data

Elevated volatility profile: 1Y volatility of 14.84% (historical).

💵 Income Reliability

Weight: 15%
Not applicable

This is an accumulating ETF. Distributions are reinvested inside the fund, so there's no dividend-reliability risk to assess. The 15% income weight is redistributed to the other three factors.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Risk scoring is model-based and past data does not guarantee future results.