Openbookopenbook
Openbook
XSPR
+5.90 · +4.15%
£148.11 · LSE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | Sector Equity Industrial Materials
DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) · Luxembourg
AUM:£43.0M
#– of – in Sector Equity Industrial Materials ETFs
ℹ️
Reward Rating
65
Good
6.91% 1Y return
ℹ️
Risk Rating
59
Elevated
Risk Assessment
ℹ️

Educational tool only – Scores are based on historical data, holdings and expense metrics for informational purposes. This is not financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Always conduct your own research or consult a qualified financial adviser.

Market Performance

📈 Up 6.9% over the past year, showing positive momentum.

Cost Efficiency

💰 Ongoing charge of 0.17% — competitive for the exposure provided.

What is XSPR?

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C tracks Morningstar Global Bas Mat TME NR USD, providing diversified exposure across 23 holdings. Its ongoing charge is 0.17%.

Performance Highlights

Investment Breakdown

Positive 1-Year Return
XSPR returned 6.9% over the past year. Historical returns only — past performance is not indicative of future results.
Competitive Ongoing Charge
Ongoing charge of 0.17% — reasonable for the index exposure provided.
Concentrated Holdings
Top 10 holdings account for 78.1% of the ETF — significant weight in a small number of names.

Openbook Analysis

Performance: Good (65)

The scoring profile reflects moderate historical performance, with a 6.9% 1-year return (historical). The ongoing charge of 0.17% is reasonable for this exposure. Risk indicators are elevated — volatility warrants consideration (historical).

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

ETF Information
AUM£43.0M
Ongoing Charge0.17%
Dividend Yield5.69%
Holdings23
Inception DateJun 2007
DomicileLuxembourg
DistributionNA
IndexMorningstar Global Bas Mat TME NR USD
ProviderDWS Investment S.A. (ETF)
Beta–
CategorySector Equity Industrial Materials
CurrencyGBX
Portfolio Impact

How would XSPR affect your portfolio?

Sign in to see exactly what adding this ETF changes — sector exposure, yield, diversification, volatility. Real numbers from your actual holdings.

Sign in
Example preview
6168
+7 points · better diversified
Alternatives
Similar ETFs to compare
CSP1
iShares Core S&P 500
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.1%
AUM£78B
Yield1.3%
VUAG
Vanguard S&P 500 Acc
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.0%
AUM£12B
Yield—
SWDA
iShares MSCI World
TER 0.20%
1Y+15.4%
AUM£62B
Yield1.6%
VWRP
Vanguard FTSE All-World
TER 0.22%
1Y+14.8%
AUM£14B
Yield1.8%

Chart Tools

My Portfolio

Sign in to overlay your portfolio on the chart.

Sign in
Compare Equity
Uses ISF.L (iShares FTSE 100 ETF)
Indicators

Performance Metrics

Historical returns

6M
+10.8%
1Y
+12.2%
3Y
+32.4%
5Y
+26.3%
OpenBook InsightIf you had invested £10,000 in XSPR 5 years ago, it would have grown to £12,632 — a gain of £2,632.

Annual Returns

Calendar year performance

XSPR delivered positive returns in 3 of the last 5 calendar years.
YearXSPR
2026 YTD+9.0%
2025+13.7%
2024-5.6%
2023+13.4%
2022-8.6%
CAGR 4yr+2.7%
3/5 positive yearsAvg return: +4.4%Worst year: -8.6% (2022)

Technical Analysis Summary

Automated insights from historical price action and indicators

Technical Regime: POSITIVE
Trend Strength
100%
Positive
Volatility
20.4%
Moderate
Momentum
+3.7%
30-day change
Support Level
145.77
Key floor
Key Insights
  • Price is currently trading above all key moving averages.
  • Monitor key support and resistance levels as part of broader risk assessment.

Reward Rating Breakdown

Our reward rating analyses XSPR's attractiveness using 4 weighted factors. Each factor is scored 0-100, then combined using the weights shown below. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Overall Reward Rating
65
Good REWARD
Data Coverage: %
Factor Framework
Performance
Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs?
Cost Efficiency
Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods?
Income
Does it provide attractive and consistent distributions?
Diversification Quality
Does it spread exposure across holdings, sectors, and regions?

📈 Performance

Weight: 30%
65/100

Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs? Combines 1/3/5/10-year returns with the Sharpe ratio (risk-adjusted return).

1Y Return
6.91%
Neutral
3Y Return
8.63%
Good
5Y Return
5.46%
Neutral
10Y Return
13.37%
Very Good
Sharpe Ratio
—
No Data

Solid historical performance: 1-year return of 6.91%, 3-year annualised 8.63%, 5-year annualised 5.46%. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

💰 Cost Efficiency

Weight: 30%
85/100

Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods? Low ongoing charges compound into meaningful additional returns over a 10-year horizon.

Ongoing Charge
0.17%
Good
Net Expense Ratio
0.00%
Very Good
Annual Turnover
0.00%
Very Good
Tracking Difference
—
No Data

Low-cost and efficient structure: ongoing charge of 0.17%, net expense ratio of 0.00%, annual turnover of 0.0%.

💵 Income

Weight: 15%
95/100

Does the ETF provide attractive and consistent distributions? Combines the current yield with distribution frequency.

Distribution Yield
5.69%
Very Good
Distribution Frequency
NA
No Data

Attractive income profile: distribution yield of 5.69%, na distributions.

🌐 Diversification Quality

Weight: 25%
24/100

Does the ETF spread exposure across many holdings, sectors, and regions? Concentrated funds can be doing exactly what they're meant to do — treat the score as context, not a verdict.

Holdings
23
Very Weak
Top 10 Concentration
78.14%
Very Weak
Top Sector
Basic Materials98.7%
Very Weak
Top Region
Europe Developed81.1%
Weak

Heavily concentrated — returns will be driven by a narrow slice of the market: 23 holdings, top 10 at 78.1%, Basic Materials sector at 98.7%, Europe Developed at 81.1%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Risk Rating Breakdown

Our risk rating analyses XSPR using 4 weighted factors. A higher score indicates higher risk. This is a framework for understanding exposure — concentrated funds can still be doing exactly what they're meant to do.

Overall Risk Rating
59
Elevated RISK
Data Coverage: 83%
Factor Framework
Holdings Concentration
How much of the fund sits in its largest positions? Few dominant names mean returns ride on those companies.
Market Exposure
Geographic, sector and cyclical dependencies. High single-country or single-sector weight increases macro sensitivity.
Volatility
Historical price movement, beta and drawdowns — how sharply the fund moves relative to the market.
Income Reliability
How dependable the distribution yield is — cyclical-sector dependency and unusually high yields can flag payout risk.

🎯 Holdings Concentration

Weight: 25%
76/100

How much of the fund sits in a small number of positions? If the top holdings dominate, returns will be driven by those specific companies rather than the broader index.

Top 10 Weight
78.14%
High Risk
Largest Holding
21.67%
High Risk
Number of Holdings
23
High Risk
HHI (weight²)
887
Lower Risk

Holdings-level concentration is high: top 10 holdings at 78.1%, largest single position at 21.67%, 23 total holdings.

🌍 Market Exposure

Weight: 25%
81/100

How dependent is the fund on a single country, sector or economic cycle? Heavy exposure to one market means a single macro event can drive most of the return.

Top Region
Europe Developed81.1%
Elevated
Top Sector
Basic Materials98.7%
High Risk
Top 2 Sectors
100.00%
High Risk
Cyclical Sectors
98.65%
High Risk

High market-exposure risk — returns closely track a narrow slice of the market: Europe Developed at 81.1%, Basic Materials sector at 98.7%, 98.7% in cyclical sectors.

📊 Volatility

Weight: 35%
20/100

How sharply does the fund move day-to-day and how deep have its drawdowns been? High volatility means wider return outcomes over short horizons.

1Y Volatility
8.86%
Lower Risk
Beta
—
No Data
Max Drawdown
—
No Data

Below-average volatility: 1Y volatility of 8.86% (historical).

💵 Income Reliability

Weight: 15%
84/100

How dependable is the fund's distribution yield? Heavy cyclical-sector exposure or unusually high yields can flag vulnerability to dividend cuts in a downturn.

Current Yield
5.69%
Elevated
Cyclical Sector Exposure
98.65%
High Risk
Top-Sector Dependency
Basic Materials98.7%
High Risk

Distributions appear cyclically sensitive — yield may be vulnerable to cuts in a downturn: yield of 5.69%, 98.7% in cyclical sectors (financials, energy, materials, industrials, real estate), Basic Materials sector at 98.7%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Risk scoring is model-based and past data does not guarantee future results.
openbook

Stock research for everyday UK investors. Make smarter decisions, faster.

Questions? Email us at contact@openbookanalytics.com

© 2026 Openbook Analytics Ltd · Company No. SC843579 · Registered in Scotland

256-bit encryption GDPR compliant UK data centres

Openbook Analytics Ltd (Company No. SC843579) is registered in Scotland. Registered office: Strathclyde Inspire Hub, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills Building (Level 6), 50 Richmond Street, Glasgow, G1 1XP. Openbook Analytics is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The content on this platform is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or any other form of advice. You should not treat any content on this platform as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, and you may get back less than you invest. User-generated content, including community posts and commentary, reflects the personal opinions of individual users, is not verified for accuracy, and does not represent the views of Openbook Analytics Ltd. You should always conduct your own research or consult a qualified, FCA-regulated financial adviser before making investment decisions. Data displayed on this platform may be delayed or inaccurate and is provided "as is" without warranty. Openbook Analytics Ltd accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on the information provided.