Openbookopenbook
Openbook
XZMJ
+2.33 · +8.44%
£29.95 · LSE
Xtrackers ESG MSCI Japan UCITS 1C EUR | Japan Large-Cap Blend Equity
DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) · Ireland
AUM:$2.3B
#– of – in Japan Large-Cap Blend Equity ETFs
ℹ️
Reward Rating
57
Good
30.50% 1Y return
ℹ️
Risk Rating
50
Elevated
Risk Assessment
ℹ️

Educational tool only – Scores are based on historical data, holdings and expense metrics for informational purposes. This is not financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Always conduct your own research or consult a qualified financial adviser.

Market Performance

📈 Up 30.5% over the past year, reflecting strong price momentum.

Cost Efficiency

💰 Ongoing charge of 0.20% — competitive for the exposure provided.

What is XZMJ?

Xtrackers ESG MSCI Japan UCITS 1C EUR tracks Morningstar Japan TME NR JPY, providing diversified exposure across 50 holdings. Its ongoing charge is 0.20%.

Performance Highlights

Investment Breakdown

Strong Recent Performance
XZMJ delivered 30.5% over the past year. Historical returns only — past performance is not indicative of future results.
Competitive Ongoing Charge
Ongoing charge of 0.20% — reasonable for the index exposure provided.
Moderate Concentration
Top 10 holdings make up 42.9% of the ETF — a moderate level of name concentration.

Openbook Analysis

Performance: Good (57)

The scoring profile reflects moderate historical performance, with a 30.5% 1-year return (historical). The ongoing charge of 0.20% is reasonable for this exposure. Risk indicators are moderate, in line with typical market exposure (historical).

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

ETF Information
AUM$2.3B
Ongoing Charge0.20%
Dividend Yield0.00%
Holdings50
Inception DateApr 2018
DomicileIreland
DistributionNA
IndexMorningstar Japan TME NR JPY
ProviderDWS Investment S.A. (ETF)
Beta0.90
CategoryJapan Large-Cap Blend Equity
CurrencyUSD
Portfolio Impact

How would XZMJ affect your portfolio?

Sign in to see exactly what adding this ETF changes — sector exposure, yield, diversification, volatility. Real numbers from your actual holdings.

Sign in
Example preview
6168
+7 points · better diversified
Alternatives
Similar ETFs to compare
CSP1
iShares Core S&P 500
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.1%
AUM£78B
Yield1.3%
VUAG
Vanguard S&P 500 Acc
TER 0.07%
1Y+18.0%
AUM£12B
Yield—
SWDA
iShares MSCI World
TER 0.20%
1Y+15.4%
AUM£62B
Yield1.6%
VWRP
Vanguard FTSE All-World
TER 0.22%
1Y+14.8%
AUM£14B
Yield1.8%

Chart Tools

My Portfolio

Sign in to overlay your portfolio on the chart.

Sign in
Compare Equity
Uses ISF.L (iShares FTSE 100 ETF)
Indicators

Performance Metrics

Historical returns

6M
+15.3%
1Y
+30.5%
3Y
+67.7%
5Y
+45.4%
OpenBook InsightIf you had invested £10,000 in XZMJ 5 years ago, it would have grown to £14,545 — a gain of £4,545.

Annual Returns

Calendar year performance

XZMJ delivered positive returns in 4 of the last 5 calendar years.
YearXZMJ
2026 YTD+14.2%
2025+23.6%
2024+10.6%
2023+18.0%
2022-22.0%
CAGR 4yr+5.9%
4/5 positive yearsAvg return: +8.9%Worst year: -22.0% (2022)

Technical Analysis Summary

Automated insights from historical price action and indicators

Technical Regime: POSITIVE
Trend Strength
100%
Positive
Volatility
18.7%
Low
Momentum
+5.3%
30-day change
Support Level
30.43
Key floor
Key Insights
  • Price is currently trading above all key moving averages.
  • Monitor key support and resistance levels as part of broader risk assessment.

Reward Rating Breakdown

Our reward rating analyses XZMJ's attractiveness using 4 weighted factors. Each factor is scored 0-100, then combined using the weights shown below. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Overall Reward Rating
57
Good REWARD
Data Coverage: %
Factor Framework
Performance
Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs?
Cost Efficiency
Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods?
Income
Does it provide attractive and consistent distributions?
Diversification Quality
Does it spread exposure across holdings, sectors, and regions?

📈 Performance

Weight: 30%
64/100

Has the ETF delivered strong historical returns versus similar ETFs? Combines 1/3/5/10-year returns with the Sharpe ratio (risk-adjusted return).

1Y Return
30.50%
Very Good
3Y Return
19.81%
Very Good
5Y Return
6.29%
Neutral
10Y Return
0.00%
Weak
Sharpe Ratio
—
No Data

Solid historical performance: 1-year return of 30.50%, 3-year annualised 19.81%, 5-year annualised 6.29%. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

💰 Cost Efficiency

Weight: 30%
85/100

Is the ETF cheap to own over long periods? Low ongoing charges compound into meaningful additional returns over a 10-year horizon.

Ongoing Charge
0.20%
Good
Net Expense Ratio
0.00%
Very Good
Annual Turnover
0.00%
Very Good
Tracking Difference
—
No Data

Low-cost and efficient structure: ongoing charge of 0.20%, net expense ratio of 0.00%, annual turnover of 0.0%.

💵 Income

Weight: 15%
15/100

Does the ETF provide attractive and consistent distributions? Combines the current yield with distribution frequency.

Distribution Yield
0.00%
Very Weak
Distribution Frequency
NA
No Data

Low-income profile — better suited as a growth holding: distribution yield of 0.00%, na distributions.

🌐 Diversification Quality

Weight: 25%
40/100

Does the ETF spread exposure across many holdings, sectors, and regions? Concentrated funds can be doing exactly what they're meant to do — treat the score as context, not a verdict.

Holdings
50
Weak
Top 10 Concentration
42.90%
Weak
Top Sector
Technology22.7%
Neutral
Top Region
Japan100.0%
Very Weak

Concentrated but typical for its category: 50 holdings, top 10 at 42.9%, Technology sector at 22.7%, Japan at 100.0%.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Risk Rating Breakdown

Our risk rating analyses XZMJ using 4 weighted factors. A higher score indicates higher risk. This is a framework for understanding exposure — concentrated funds can still be doing exactly what they're meant to do.

Overall Risk Rating
50
Elevated RISK
Data Coverage: 83%
Factor Framework
Holdings Concentration
How much of the fund sits in its largest positions? Few dominant names mean returns ride on those companies.
Market Exposure
Geographic, sector and cyclical dependencies. High single-country or single-sector weight increases macro sensitivity.
Volatility
Historical price movement, beta and drawdowns — how sharply the fund moves relative to the market.
Income Reliability
How dependable the distribution yield is — cyclical-sector dependency and unusually high yields can flag payout risk.

🎯 Holdings Concentration

Weight: 25%
48/100

How much of the fund sits in a small number of positions? If the top holdings dominate, returns will be driven by those specific companies rather than the broader index.

Top 10 Weight
42.90%
Moderate
Largest Holding
6.56%
Moderate
Number of Holdings
50
Moderate
HHI (weight²)
202
Low Risk

Reasonable spread across positions: top 10 holdings at 42.9%, largest single position at 6.56%, 50 total holdings.

🌍 Market Exposure

Weight: 25%
72/100

How dependent is the fund on a single country, sector or economic cycle? Heavy exposure to one market means a single macro event can drive most of the return.

Top Region
Japan100.0%
High Risk
Top Sector
Technology22.7%
Moderate
Top 2 Sectors
42.98%
Moderate
Cyclical Sectors
47.54%
Elevated

High market-exposure risk — returns closely track a narrow slice of the market: Japan at 100.0%, Technology sector at 22.7%, 47.5% in cyclical sectors.

📊 Volatility

Weight: 35%
35/100

How sharply does the fund move day-to-day and how deep have its drawdowns been? High volatility means wider return outcomes over short horizons.

1Y Volatility
11.55%
Lower Risk
Beta
0.90
Lower Risk
Max Drawdown
—
No Data

Moderate volatility in line with broad market: 1Y volatility of 11.55%, beta of 0.90 (historical).

💵 Income Reliability

Weight: 15%
Not applicable

This is an accumulating ETF. Distributions are reinvested inside the fund, so there's no dividend-reliability risk to assess. The 15% income weight is redistributed to the other three factors.

Scores are derived from fund-provider disclosures and historical data. For informational and educational purposes only — not investment advice. Risk scoring is model-based and past data does not guarantee future results.
openbook

Stock research for everyday UK investors. Make smarter decisions, faster.

Questions? Email us at contact@openbookanalytics.com

© 2026 Openbook Analytics Ltd · Company No. SC843579 · Registered in Scotland

256-bit encryption GDPR compliant UK data centres

Openbook Analytics Ltd (Company No. SC843579) is registered in Scotland. Registered office: Strathclyde Inspire Hub, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills Building (Level 6), 50 Richmond Street, Glasgow, G1 1XP. Openbook Analytics is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The content on this platform is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or any other form of advice. You should not treat any content on this platform as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, and you may get back less than you invest. User-generated content, including community posts and commentary, reflects the personal opinions of individual users, is not verified for accuracy, and does not represent the views of Openbook Analytics Ltd. You should always conduct your own research or consult a qualified, FCA-regulated financial adviser before making investment decisions. Data displayed on this platform may be delayed or inaccurate and is provided "as is" without warranty. Openbook Analytics Ltd accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on the information provided.