Hargreaves Lansdown vs AJ Bell: Which Is Better for UK Investors?

Hargreaves Lansdown and AJ Bell are the two names that come up first when a UK investor with a meaningful portfolio asks where to hold it. Both are long-established, both are listed companies in their own right, both offer every mainstream account type, and both have the depth of funds, shares and research that the app-first brokers do not. The choice between them usually comes down to price, and then to the small differences in how each platform works day to day. This Hargreaves Lansdown vs AJ Bell comparison covers those, and then the part that matters more as your portfolio grows: how each handles your data, and how to see both in one place if you end up with accounts at each.

Accounts and Range

Both platforms offer a Stocks & Shares ISA, a SIPP, a general dealing account, a Lifetime ISA and a Junior ISA, and both give access to UK and international shares, funds, investment trusts and ETFs. Neither is built around fractional shares the way the app-first brokers are. HL is the larger of the two by assets and customers, and its research and fund shortlists are more extensive. AJ Bell's platform is plainer but covers the same ground for the great majority of investors.

Pricing Models

Both charge a percentage-based platform fee on funds and a per-deal charge on shares, with caps and reductions that depend on the account type and how often you deal. The detail changes regularly on both platforms, so the only reliable comparison is the two current tariff pages side by side with your own portfolio size and dealing frequency in mind. As a rule of thumb that has held for years, AJ Bell tends to come out cheaper for most portfolio sizes, and HL's higher cost buys a more polished service and more research. Whether that is worth it is a personal judgement rather than a calculation.

Data Access: How Each Lets You Get Your Portfolio Out

Neither platform has an API or any way to connect a third-party tool directly. Both provide a transaction history download per account, and that is what a portfolio tracker needs. The differences are in the file.

• Hargreaves Lansdown exports each account's transaction history as CSV, or as a table you can copy into Excel. The file names each holding but carries no ticker codes, and UK prices are in pence. Matching holdings therefore has to be done by name. Our HL export guide walks through it.
• AJ Bell exports each account's deals as CSV with the security, quantity, price and an Amount (GBP) column. UK prices are in pence, but the amount column lets every price be cross-checked, which makes AJ Bell's file the easier of the two to work with. Our AJ Bell tracker guide covers it.

Neither account view shows a benchmark, an income history, sector concentration or any measure of risk, and both show each account separately rather than as one portfolio.

Use both?

See HL and AJ Bell as one portfolio

Import each platform's export as it downloaded. Openbook works out the columns, reads UK prices as pence, matches HL holdings by name with a picker to confirm, and combines everything into one portfolio with one benchmark and a Reward and Risk score on every position.

Import your portfolios →

Which Is Easier to Track Properly?

AJ Bell, by a little. Its export carries enough information to check itself, and holdings match reliably. HL's export is complete but needs each holding matched by name, which a good tracker handles with a one-time confirmation. Neither difference should decide where you hold your money; both are well within what a purpose-built tracker manages automatically. It should decide how much you trust a DIY spreadsheet: with HL data in particular, the missing tickers and pence prices are where spreadsheet valuations go wrong.

Where Each Platform Falls Short

• Both: accounts shown separately, no benchmark, no income history, no concentration or risk view, no API.
• Hargreaves Lansdown: the higher cost, and an export that leaves the matching work to you.
• AJ Bell: less research and a plainer interface, which some investors prefer and some do not.

Using Both: How to Get One View

It is common to end up with a SIPP at one platform and an ISA at the other, often because of a transfer or an employer scheme. The platforms will never show the two together, so the combined picture has to live elsewhere. Export each account's history, import them into the same tracker, and holdings like Legal & General (LGEN), or HL (HL.) and AJ Bell (AJB) themselves, become single positions with a single weight in your total. From there the questions the platforms cannot answer become quick checks: whether the whole portfolio has beaten a tracker, how dependent your income is on a few payers, and whether your sector mix is the one you intended. Our Hargreaves Lansdown portfolio tracker and AJ Bell portfolio tracker guides cover each side in detail.

No card required

Set the analytics layer up once

Create a free Openbook account, bring in both platforms, and see performance against a benchmark, dividend income by month, sector concentration and a Reward and Risk score on every holding.

Create a free account →

Research, Service and the App

The part of the comparison that price does not capture. HL's research output is the larger: fund shortlists, share research notes, market commentary and a steady stream of explanatory content, all of it aimed at helping a DIY investor make decisions on the platform. AJ Bell offers research and a curated fund list too, in smaller volume and with less polish. Whether that matters depends on how you invest. An investor who picks funds from a shortlist and rarely looks further will find HL's material genuinely useful; one who does their own analysis, or uses independent tools for it, is paying for research they do not read. Both apps are competent for checking balances and dealing; neither is where you would do serious analysis, which is the point of this guide.

Transfers and Moving Between Them

Both platforms accept transfers in of ISAs, SIPPs and general accounts, usually in specie, meaning your holdings move without being sold, and transfer times for large accounts run to weeks rather than days. Before moving, check the current transfer-out charges on the platform you are leaving, and export its full transaction history first. A transfer carries your holdings across but not their purchase history: the receiving platform's records start on the transfer date, and your original costs and dates live only in the old platform's export. If you want a complete picture, and for a general account you will need one for capital gains, download the history before the old account closes and keep it with the new one.

The Verdict

For most investors the honest answer is that AJ Bell does the same job for less, and HL charges more for a more polished service and deeper research that a minority will use. Both are safe, well-run places to hold a portfolio. Neither is a portfolio tracker, and whichever you choose, the analysis that tells you whether your investing is working has to come from somewhere else. Our guide to UK portfolio trackers sets out what to look for, and our guide to investing accounts covers the ISA, SIPP and general account choice that matters more than the platform.

Next step

See what your portfolio is actually exposed to

Whichever platform you use, or both: sector concentration, income by holding, drawdown history and a Reward and Risk score on every position, in one place.

Open your portfolio →

You can Compare HL, AJB, LGEN side by side on Openbook, or find stocks with the screener.